Two years ago after trying and failing at a few on-line businesses, a net friend told us that a lot of people on
the web wanted to fund e-gold accounts they had, but because of the $3,000.00 minimum they needed some
one who could sell them smaller amounts. Some wanted to use it as a payment service and others wanted
to invest in gold or other precious metals. Hanna used her credit card and bank account to open a PAYPAL
account. We borrowed the money to buy the gold and started letting people know that we could help them
fund their e-gold accounts. We started in October and by December we were so busy we could hardly keep
up with it. A small problem with Paypal cropped up in November and we though we had it worked out. They told me we were one of their biggest accounts. They even went as far as to tell us we had a "red carpet"
account. Come the middle of January, we started to realize the truth about Paypal. Day after day, they sent emails saying we had possible
fraudulent funds, and asking for us to send information to them, which we did. When they produced no results, I called customer service. The tone had changed and I was told because
we dealt in e-gold we weren't covered by the SELLER PROTECTION PLAN and basically, they didn't want our
business. After making some $16,000 in fees off of us, they took some $30,000 out of our account over a
period of app. 3 weeks, and by February our balance was in the red. I called and emailed them to stop
accepting money into our account (which they had locked) but no, they kept accepting peoples money. Our
customers soon started to ask why we hadn't funded their accounts. We explained that Paypal had locked
our account and we were not aware they had sent money to us. You see, our customers had become so
loyal and trusting of us, they just sent money and knew we would fund their accounts.
Now here's the problem as we see it. Remember, if your a paypal user, that this
occurred between Oct. 2000 and Feb. 2001.
Paypal's terms of use were and are still contradictory. The one
consistent thing about them is that they are written in a way to exclude the consumer of their rights and sets themselves up as God, judge and jury over
the unsuspecting customer.
Paypal boasts that you can send money to anyone that has an e-mail address. They also had been backed
by x.com, which was an online bank. People like ourselves believed they were basically a BANK.
Paypal accepted credit cards from people and
transferred the funds to other accounts as designated by the sender. As we see it, people put money from their credit cards into their Paypal accounts, and then
transferred the money from that account to our account. After all, you had to have a paypal account to use
your credit card.
Paypal sent us an e-mail saying, "you've got cash". Meaning that money from a credit card was
transferred into a persons account and then
transferred to our account. Paypal had an e-check system in which the funds
took 5 days to clear. Why would they take credit cards on an instant basis.
Paypal, under their privacy policy held all the account holders information confidential.
When paypal began sending us notices that we had "potentially
fraudulent funds", we send back the information they requested for their investigation. We were told this was needed to be covered under their
seller protection program. We never received any answer from them and didn't know what was going on
until we saw money being deducted from our account. We called customer service and spoke to several
people, that said they would look into it. No one ever called us back or e-mailed us with any answers. Finally I called the main office in California and talked with a very rude person named Jennifer Durham, who told me that e-gold was not covered under the SPP and their was nothing we could do about it. She said the credit cards were stolen and we were responsible for reimbursing Paypal for them. She sent me an e-mail
with a list of e-mail addresses and the dates and amounts of these transactions. All of a sudden, this list had
grown to almost 70 transactions.
To our amazement, when we searched our records and were able to contact several of these people, we
found out that the money had been deducted from their credit cards. So they didn't have the money and we
didn't have it, which meant Paypal had it. Later Paypal claimed "it was an honest mistake". Several others
proved to be "honest mistakes", only after we e-mailed all the supposed
"fraudulent accounts". My claims of possible "employee fraud" were denied and classified as "impossible" by Paypal exec's.
We found out later, that some of the credit cards were indeed
fraudulent, Paypal had accepted them after they failed 2 or more address verification checks. We also found that 1 credit card was listed on 3 separate
accounts, with different names and states. Paypal claims their fraud department is one of the best in the
industry !!!!!!!!!!!!! Paypal's fraud manager testified, that the company had no training or training manuals, and that 90 days prior to becoming a fraud manager, he worked for a cement company.
The remaining, so called
"fraudulent credit cards" had statements claiming "unauthorized " use. The cards
were not stolen or out of their possession at any time. Which could mean "double dipping" or employee
fraud.
Please remember that the mistakes we made are made by thousands of people each week.
Read the TERMS OF USE, we did and thought we understood them. If your a lawyer then you might be able
to comprehend what your reading. if your not a lawyer then seek one's advice. Any good lawyer will tell you the terms are unconscionable and one sided. By accepting them you give up your rights. The one most
important clause to look at is the arbitration clause. We
will discuss arbitration in a separate section. We thought we were protected by a so-called seller protection plan. This plan as thousands have seen is riddled
with ways for Paypal to avoid paying. You have to remember that Paypal is what you would call "self
insured". They did boast Travelers insurance, if your account was "hacked". That in itself was a sham. The
fact was that only after accounts were "hacked" to an aggregate amount of $250K, then the insurance paid. It paid Paypal not the customers. So Paypal used the Travelers logo to lull
customers into a false sense of security. Plainly a deceptive practice. Paypal constantly "freezes" accounts for any reason they decide, and
your money is theirs until they decide to give it back to you. Without interest I might add. They have now
added to their TOS, that you agree to allow them to be able to withdraw any and all money from your bank
account at their
discretion.